Jump to content


Military Honor


  • Please log in to reply
101 replies to this topic

Skullcandy #21 Posted 26 May 2017 - 03:01 AM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 18546 battles
  • 1,164
  • [1RTR]
  • Member since:
    05-02-2011

According to the game news complaints against players will be checked. I sure hope this is the case. And I sure hope WG enforces penalties against those who give false complaints (ranging from ban from voting to ban from playing depending on history).

 

Immediately after this battle I got a "complaint" for inactivity. Presumably from someone on the reds. Considering that I absolutely pwnd the red IS through peekaboom and circle of death I suspect it was him.

So yeah, do false negative voters get penalties enforced against them at all? 

 


Leader of 1RTR. | 1RTR on Discord "Nothing in life is so exhilarating as to be shot at without result." – Winston Churchill


jessethetank #22 Posted 26 May 2017 - 06:24 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 7128 battles
  • 2
  • [PNLD]
  • Member since:
    02-26-2012

The vote system need to be adjustment. Another reason why it need to be adjusted, is that's I am mark as "inactive" but the loading time of the game is sometimes so long that some players mark me as inactive. maybe need the Windows 10 mobile edition a speed up update or something.

I don't want to be banned from the WG servers after 5 years of service :ohmy:



Dans79Vet #23 Posted 26 May 2017 - 07:23 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 30553 battles
  • 1,391
  • [-GNA-]
  • Member since:
    11-07-2014

View PostDans79Vet, on 25 May 2017 - 10:50 PM, said:

IMG_4778.PNG

So they say bad honour resets, So does the good also?

I think I've missed something in the notes on how this works.

Can someone explain?

Getting flagged for inactive when carried game. 

Get flagged for bad chat when asking a player to move to help.

Over it now, not enough positives able to give out.

 

Well seeing as you say the ratings reset and there is no benifit in the system,

I just going back to calling the useless players useless... or words to that effect 

Because whats the worst that can happen? i wait 3 days and it resets...


2017 Blitz Fair is on par with Patch3.8 equipment change.... Fking Broken.  2017 has been the worst year for Blitz, fire who ever has these stupid ideas. Due to this WoW Blitz will never see a $ of mine.


REITSY #24 Posted 27 May 2017 - 01:22 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 10182 battles
  • 7
  • [-GNA-]
  • Member since:
    09-15-2013

I have now received two inactivity reports eventhough I finished top on XP and DMG in both games with at least 1 kill in both.

There should be an automated system that blocks someone giving you the negative Inactivity report if you have dealt say more than 0 dmg or something similar. That can't be that hard to program.



Eulengesicht_2014 #25 Posted 27 May 2017 - 02:41 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 85684 battles
  • 2,603
  • [DMX]
  • Member since:
    07-01-2014

View PostREITSY, on 27 May 2017 - 01:22 PM, said:

I have now received two inactivity reports eventhough I finished top on XP and DMG in both games with at least 1 kill in both.

There should be an automated system that blocks someone giving you the negative Inactivity report if you have dealt say more than 0 dmg or something similar. That can't be that hard to program.

 

No panic, guy

 

Your actually rating is ***** and 18/2


 
 
 
 

 


Salier1959 #26 Posted 27 May 2017 - 03:56 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 35958 battles
  • 7
  • [TB_XX]
  • Member since:
    09-30-2015
This idea has its flaws. Its gives those players who are unsportive in nature an instrument to give others (palm something) a bad report. So they have double fun now because they Will not care for themselves. And once made A false report iT can not be undone. Today i have got A complaint for "provocative communication" whilst i never have made A negatieve remark during the game since i play iT. I think iT was meant for another player but i am stuck with iT now.

petes85 #27 Posted 27 May 2017 - 08:27 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Player
  • 36635 battles
  • 657
  • [8ASIL]
  • Member since:
    05-22-2014

View PostEulengesicht_2014, on 25 May 2017 - 04:25 PM, said:

Can I imagine: the worst player on the EUServer:

worst player.png

and it goes well: last night the player striked by a battle in the green team with announcement! Zero DMG and no move in the fight.

 

Edit: the player are obviously banned from the game actually, can't find him. 

So why are this potatoes playing this game, it took 4 or 5 days to Ban this raging potato, Down voted over 20 Times, well gladly More potatoes connect to play & rage 



theluckstar #28 Posted 28 May 2017 - 01:10 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 12459 battles
  • 10
  • [REV1S]
  • Member since:
    12-01-2012
I really like this feature. I hope WG can carefully adjust the weight of praise/complaint ind ifferent situation to minimise unfairness. I can see some people are exchanging all their priases with their own platoon/clan mates without necessairly playing well. And I really hope the complaint system can be combined with the battle results. For example, if you got say top three in your team, then red team shouldn't be able to complain you for inactive.

petes85 #29 Posted 28 May 2017 - 12:20 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Player
  • 36635 battles
  • 657
  • [8ASIL]
  • Member since:
    05-22-2014

View Posttheluckstar, on 28 May 2017 - 03:10 AM, said:

I really like this feature. I hope WG can carefully adjust the weight of praise/complaint ind ifferent situation to minimise unfairness. I can see some people are exchanging all their priases with their own platoon/clan mates without necessairly playing well. And I really hope the complaint system can be combined with the battle results. For example, if you got say top three in your team, then red team shouldn't be able to complain you for inactive.

Agreed and well explained



Oberst_Leutnant1 #30 Posted 28 May 2017 - 02:43 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 31487 battles
  • 26
  • [CDTD]
  • Member since:
    04-17-2016

I think this rating system is a totally corrupt system.

 

Being rated 6 times for being inactive in battle, but in all those battles i was in the top 3 of being damage dealt.

 

in one battle i did the most damage 3900+hp with wt/pz4 from a sniping position. As you all know, this tank is a sniper tank it has little to no armor at all and yet they rated me as an inactive player.....

No, i do not like this voting system at all.

Also i have seen that some people whom were truely inactive or unsporting people were rated with efficient ratings...

 

this system is not good at all. And above that, i usually play 50 battles a day and see so many useless noobs i cannot even downgrade them....

 

Best thing for this system would be only positives voting to choose at teamplayer, effective player and worthly opponent. and not in limited votes.

 

Why should the red team vote you for inactive? it is in their interest. only worthly opponent is enough

red team is still the enemy right?

 


Edited by Oberst_Leutnant1, 28 May 2017 - 02:49 PM.


_Minchy_ #31 Posted 28 May 2017 - 07:06 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 5800 battles
  • 10
  • [BDBIH]
  • Member since:
    12-09-2016

For unsporting conduct battle ban 1h...

 

I was reported by a guy what said to me at the beginning "t44is noob" and I decidet just at the first part of battle to stop him and when a lot of enemies appeard I was facing them off,I was not blocking him im battle..And he reported me and I GOT BANNED FOR 3 DAYS !

Thank you Wargaming thank you.If please you could unban me I will be too happy my nick is _Minchy_

 


Edited by VMX, 02 June 2017 - 12:59 PM.


Eulengesicht_2014 #32 Posted 28 May 2017 - 07:53 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 85684 battles
  • 2,603
  • [DMX]
  • Member since:
    07-01-2014

New Highscore for military honour?

 

100 Points.png

 


 
 
 
 

 


petes85 #33 Posted 29 May 2017 - 10:28 AM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Player
  • 36635 battles
  • 657
  • [8ASIL]
  • Member since:
    05-22-2014

View PostEulengesicht_2014, on 28 May 2017 - 09:53 PM, said:

New Highscore for military honour?

 

100 Points.png

 

:):) New record on indeed



Eulengesicht_2014 #34 Posted 29 May 2017 - 03:53 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 85684 battles
  • 2,603
  • [DMX]
  • Member since:
    07-01-2014

View PostOberst_Leutnant1, on 28 May 2017 - 02:43 PM, said:

I think this rating system is a totally corrupt system.

 

Being rated 6 times for being inactive in battle, but in all those battles i was in the top 3 of being damage dealt.

 

in one battle i did the most damage 3900+hp with wt/pz4 from a sniping position. As you all know, this tank is a sniper tank it has little to no armor at all and yet they rated me as an inactive player.....

No, i do not like this voting system at all.

Also i have seen that some people whom were truely inactive or unsporting people were rated with efficient ratings...

 

this system is not good at all. And above that, i usually play 50 battles a day and see so many useless noobs i cannot even downgrade them....

 

Best thing for this system would be only positives voting to choose at teamplayer, effective player and worthly opponent. and not in limited votes.

 

Why should the red team vote you for inactive? it is in their interest. only worthly opponent is enough

red team is still the enemy right?

 

 

So you have actually 15 positive and 6 negative votes and your *Rating is ***, the same as the Backup 3.9 begins - no losses by the *. So what's your problem?
 
 
 
 

 


Eulengesicht_2014 #35 Posted 29 May 2017 - 07:42 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 85684 battles
  • 2,603
  • [DMX]
  • Member since:
    07-01-2014

Ladies & Gentleman

 

We have a new record:

159.png

 


 
 
 
 

 


bigdog64 #36 Posted 29 May 2017 - 07:44 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 26339 battles
  • 1
  • [LAGER]
  • Member since:
    12-28-2015
Has anyone else had the awarded worthy player "military honour" reduced, as I have spotted it twice on my awards.  

Eulengesicht_2014 #37 Posted 29 May 2017 - 07:57 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 85684 battles
  • 2,603
  • [DMX]
  • Member since:
    07-01-2014

View Postbigdog64, on 29 May 2017 - 07:44 PM, said:

Has anyone else had the awarded worthy player "military honour" reduced, as I have spotted it twice on my awards.  

 

No, but your Rating actually ***** (14/3)
 
 
 
 

 


Flyingscotsman69 #38 Posted 30 May 2017 - 05:57 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 15381 battles
  • 9
  • [SCO]
  • Member since:
    12-26-2015

After 1 game where I had a go at someone who called me a moron for not following his lead, he then tells others in team to vote me down. I then get a message stating my military honour is reduced due to complaints! What a Croc of crap,  the amount of times I've had 5 or 6 kills in one game, but let's ignore that and demote someone due to the actions of some Edited in 1 game. Not fair at all developers!! You should look at overall gamer involvement.  Feel like losing all stars just for he'll of it.

 

This post has been edited by the moderation team due to swearing. 


Edited by VMX, 02 June 2017 - 01:02 PM.


mrpgilbert #39 Posted 30 May 2017 - 07:26 AM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 28252 battles
  • 5,958
  • [AFK]
  • Member since:
    03-05-2013

View PostFlyingscotsman69, on 30 May 2017 - 05:57 AM, said:

After 1 game where I had a go at someone who called me a moron for not following his lead, he then tells others in team to vote me down. I then get a message stating my military honour is reduced due to complaints! What a Croc of crap,  the amount of times I've had 5 or 6 kills in one game, but let's ignore that and demote someone due to the actions of some Edited in 1 game. Not fair at all developers!! You should look at overall gamer involvement.  Feel like losing all stars just for he'll of it.

Don't feed trolls. Just because someone is a berk, doesn't mean you should be, too. 

And also, a few negative votes in one game are pretty irrelevant. Ignore it, play the game.


Edited by VMX, 02 June 2017 - 01:03 PM.

Denoobing member of the Active Frontline Klan - and proud of it.

Be nice to me..

http://www.blitzstar...r/eu/mrpgilbert


the_Bully #40 Posted 30 May 2017 - 07:42 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 14690 battles
  • 26
  • [2424]
  • Member since:
    06-26-2014

You can try to ignore it, but it is there. It is very clear that folks are more reluctant now not to follow the orders of the <<<left or right>>> generals. If you dont obey, you will be branded as inactive. No-turret TD's are very vulnerable to this abuse. My solution: if the team will lose, Edited because when you are the last tank standing the loss will be your fault. Not what was meant to be...

 

Apart from that, the fact that platoonmates and clanmembers can upvote each other is ridiculous. Even when it is not counted towards the hono(u)r rating, it makes the system somewhat laughable.

 

Even noobs like me, with no special interest in winrate, are affected by this. A lesser winrate is your personal ability, Military honor is your honor, and extremely more important.

 

This post has been edited by the moderation team due to inappropriate remarks.

 


Edited by VMX, 02 June 2017 - 01:04 PM.





4 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 4 guests, 0 anonymous users