Jump to content


Military Honor


  • Please log in to reply
101 replies to this topic

Chairman_merpug #41 Posted 30 May 2017 - 08:11 AM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 35126 battles
  • 7,649
  • [AFK]
  • Member since:
    03-05-2013

View Postthe_Bully, on 30 May 2017 - 07:42 AM, said:

Even noobs like me, with no special interest in winrate, are affected by this. A lesser winrate is your personal ability, Military honor is your honor, and extremely more important.

Really, it isn't. It's just been invented by Wargaming, it isn't a real thing. A further layer of smoke and mirrors to distract from core gameplay. Play to the strengths of your tank in that game and on that map. Never go alone. If some lackwit suggests a strategy that's patently wrong, and the herd goes with him, follow at a respectful distance until you know where the reds are and then put yourself in the best position to damage them without dying.

Note: I have failed to follow my own advice recently, which has dented my winrate. Honour rating is average.


Denoobing member of the Active Frontline Klan - and proud of it. Be nice to me..https://www.blitzstars.com/player/eu/Chairman_merpug


sixty_three #42 Posted 30 May 2017 - 08:41 AM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 12164 battles
  • 1,243
  • Member since:
    04-29-2017

IMO the MH system is just another form of player communication, albeit one that is used to generate statistics. Because many people agonise over their WR, it doesn't surprise me that the honour rating is also attracting much attention.

 

I'm waiting for somebody to blame MM for putting them into matches where their honour is unfairly downvoted... ;)


One of life’s challenges — knowing enough to think you are right, but not enough to know that you are wrong.

 


Birdistheword15 #43 Posted 30 May 2017 - 09:21 AM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 37571 battles
  • 1,227
  • [BRIT6]
  • Member since:
    01-11-2015

While i can see the point of MH i think it masks a more long term issue - the lack of a dedicated mandatory training system in-game.

 

Anyway at the end of day i know my contribution to the game. Vote me up or down. Whatever.


Edited by Birdistheword15, 30 May 2017 - 09:31 AM.


Eulengesicht_2014 #44 Posted 30 May 2017 - 10:48 AM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 96974 battles
  • 2,891
  • [DMX]
  • Member since:
    07-01-2014

View PostFlyingscotsman69, on 30 May 2017 - 05:57 AM, said:

After 1 game where I had a go at someone who called me a moron for not following his lead, he then tells others in team to vote me down. I then get a message stating my military honour is reduced due to complaints! What a Croc of crap,  the amount of times I've had 5 or 6 kills in one game, but let's ignore that and demote someone due to the actions of some arseholes in 1 game. Not fair at all developers!! You should look at overall gamer involvement.  Feel like losing all stars just for he'll of it.

 

Yes in fact, your actually rating is **. But look at your stats and history, please. There was no Radley or Pool medal for 5 or 6 kills since update 3.9. The last Pool medal on day before the update (05.23.) - nothing seen  since Update 3.9. 

Bildschirmfoto 2017-05-30 um 12.37.59.png


 
 
 
 

 


bladefury_1 #45 Posted 30 May 2017 - 03:24 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 2432 battles
  • 40
  • [UN]
  • Member since:
    01-29-2017

View Postthe_Bully, on 30 May 2017 - 07:42 

 

Even "noobs like me" with no special interest in winrate, are affected by this. A lesser winrate is your personal ability, Military honor is your honor, and extremely more important.

 

 

 

I ...as a real noob (2k battles)would never class someone like yourself bully (12k battles)as a noob,more I would say your an experienced player whose advice etc I would be happy to take notice of....:)


Edited by bladefury_1, 30 May 2017 - 03:33 PM.


the_Bully #46 Posted 30 May 2017 - 04:20 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 14815 battles
  • 26
  • [2424]
  • Member since:
    06-26-2014
Well, was talking about winrate, and noob in general terms. You are as noob as you feel, ofcourse. Indeed, disregarding it is best, but it ain't easy. I think blitz is an sich a very nice game, so it really hurts when stupid mechanics is hurting it. 

_NormanP_ #47 Posted 31 May 2017 - 06:26 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 29897 battles
  • 359
  • [ALBA]
  • Member since:
    12-17-2014

MH?

 

Broken and abused already


ALBA - Carry harder

Play for team, play hard

Everyone started out as a Noob, just taking me longer to grow up :)


Salier1959 #48 Posted 01 June 2017 - 05:52 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 43144 battles
  • 10
  • [TB_XX]
  • Member since:
    09-30-2015

View PostCommunity, on 23 May 2017 - 12:03 PM, said:

Complaining about the unwelcome and praising the worthy.
<a href="https://wotblitz.eu/en/news/pc-browser/generalnews/military-honor/">Full news text</a>

 

Give Idiots Some matches to play with....... and they Will start A fire.

Although the idea was praiseworthy, in practice iT became shambles. I pitty the players with TD's as they probably suffer the most. I think A few players are left who take iT seriously. The majority are not interested anymore and do not care to vote.

 



mariusrotaru81 #49 Posted 01 June 2017 - 06:53 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 31840 battles
  • 6
  • [LGN_R]
  • Member since:
    04-09-2016
yeah, these guys are right! every run-down noob can abuse this feature. in just two days, I lost all my stars. moreover, I can't vote because my **24 hours player asessment time is up**, whatever that means. oh, and please stop replying so goddamn much! you're blocking the server!

mariusrotaru81 #50 Posted 01 June 2017 - 06:59 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 31840 battles
  • 6
  • [LGN_R]
  • Member since:
    04-09-2016

View Postthe_Bully, on 30 May 2017 - 07:42 AM, said:

You can try to ignore it, but it is there. It is very clear that folks are more reluctant now not to follow the orders of the <<<left or right>>> generals. If you dont obey, you will be branded as inactive. No-turret TD's are very vulnerable to this abuse. My solution: if the team will lose, I let myself be killed ASAP, because when you are the last tank standing the loss will be your fault. Not what was meant to be...

 

Apart from that, the fact that platoonmates and clanmembers can upvote each other is ridiculous. Even when it is not counted towards the hono(u)r rating, it makes the system somewhat laughable.

 

Even noobs like me, with no special interest in winrate, are affected by this. A lesser winrate is your personal ability, Military honor is your honor, and extremely more important.

 

 

 

you're right, but do they care about it? (WG I mean)



mariusrotaru81 #51 Posted 01 June 2017 - 07:05 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 31840 battles
  • 6
  • [LGN_R]
  • Member since:
    04-09-2016

View PostEulengesicht_2014, on 29 May 2017 - 07:57 PM, said:

 

No, but your Rating actually ***** (14/3)

 

what is my actual Rating?:)

Skullcandy #52 Posted 02 June 2017 - 04:09 AM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 22026 battles
  • 1,249
  • [1RTR]
  • Member since:
    05-02-2011

Some of my recent battles and votes acquired after:

 

  • 4.5k damage, 5 kills. Sole carrying survivor. No votes.
  • 3.2k damage, 4 kills. No votes.
  • 2.1k damage, 4 kills. No votes.
  • 3.1k damage, 5 kills. Sole carrying survivor. Provocative communication vote (only "communication" in the game was an "affirmative" in response to a teammate calling SOS).
  • 2.4k damage, 3 kills. No votes.
  • 2.3k damage, 4 kills. No votes.

 

The system's working well, I see.

 

 

EDIT:

Yaaay! 3k damage, 3 kills. Effective teammate vote. 


Edited by Skullcandy, 02 June 2017 - 04:19 AM.

Leader of 1RTR. | 1RTR on Discord "Nothing in life is so exhilarating as to be shot at without result." – Winston Churchill


Eulengesicht_2014 #53 Posted 02 June 2017 - 04:23 AM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 96974 battles
  • 2,891
  • [DMX]
  • Member since:
    07-01-2014
I think we should distribute positive ratings to the weaker players only if they deliver properly and decide decisively the battle result. I experience all too often that weaker players have negative entries more than enough, positive rather hardly. If I see such a player outgrown, I do not hesitate with a positive vote.

 
 
 
 

 


Verblonde #54 Posted 02 June 2017 - 12:39 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 4654 battles
  • 279
  • [9TH]
  • Member since:
    02-02-2015
One tweak I would suggest is to ration the total number of actions, rather than each type - I gave a couple of 'positives' this morning, ran out, and now only have the option to whinge about people...

Eulengesicht_2014 #55 Posted 04 June 2017 - 10:48 AM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 96974 battles
  • 2,891
  • [DMX]
  • Member since:
    07-01-2014

View PostSkullcandy, on 02 June 2017 - 04:09 AM, said:

Some of my recent battles and votes acquired after:

 

  • 4.5k damage, 5 kills. Sole carrying survivor. No votes.
  • 3.2k damage, 4 kills. No votes.
  • 2.1k damage, 4 kills. No votes.
  • 3.1k damage, 5 kills. Sole carrying survivor. Provocative communication vote (only "communication" in the game was an "affirmative" in response to a teammate calling SOS).
  • 2.4k damage, 3 kills. No votes.
  • 2.3k damage, 4 kills. No votes.

 

The system's working well, I see.

 

 

EDIT:

Yaaay! 3k damage, 3 kills. Effective teammate vote. 

 

Think, the system works very well, but look at you:

After 124 games since update 3.9 your MH rising up from *** to **** MH. 



After a good performance you can not always expect a good vote, because the positive votes are very rare.

 

After 766 battles here my history about MH:

 

 

since Update 3.9

766

Battles

Rating

Military Honour

positiv

negativ

 

Fr., 26. Mai 2017

16

1

***

Sa., 27. Mai 2017

13

2

***

So., 28. Mai 2017

14

1

***

Mo., 29. Mai 2017

12

1

***

Di., 30. Mai 2017

12

1

****

Mi., 31. Mai 2017

10

1

****

Do., 01. Juni 2017

6

1

****

Fr., 02. Juni 2017

9

2

*****

Sa., 03. Juni 2017

10

3

*****

So., 04. Juni 2017

12

4

*****


 
 
 
 

 


Skullcandy #56 Posted 05 June 2017 - 04:47 AM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 22026 battles
  • 1,249
  • [1RTR]
  • Member since:
    05-02-2011

Lol, "no applied penalties".

Met this doughnut in battle. He definitely deserves all those negative votes. Just sits at spawn watching the red tanks shoot him and doesn't shoot back. No he's not AFK, he turns his turret to watch both the red and green tanks, just doesn't move from spawn to do it. Classic XP farmer. 


Edited by Skullcandy, 05 June 2017 - 04:55 AM.

Leader of 1RTR. | 1RTR on Discord "Nothing in life is so exhilarating as to be shot at without result." – Winston Churchill


Patje89 #57 Posted 05 June 2017 - 07:30 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 5075 battles
  • 8
  • [DU_KI]
  • Member since:
    10-23-2016
Hahaha, this system is a complete joke! Just got 2 inactives for ending with most dmg xD
WG: Better delete this again in the next update...

petes85 #58 Posted 05 June 2017 - 08:22 AM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Player
  • 40571 battles
  • 956
  • [KORPI]
  • Member since:
    05-22-2014
Still 3 worthy opponent ????

Eulengesicht_2014 #59 Posted 05 June 2017 - 12:45 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 96974 battles
  • 2,891
  • [DMX]
  • Member since:
    07-01-2014

View PostSkullcandy, on 05 June 2017 - 04:47 AM, said:

Lol, "no applied penalties".

Met this doughnut in battle. He definitely deserves all those negative votes. Just sits at spawn watching the red tanks shoot him and doesn't shoot back. No he's not AFK, he turns his turret to watch both the red and green tanks, just doesn't move from spawn to do it. Classic XP farmer. 

 

Yes, you are right! Since update 3.9 I observe three player like this. In only one case we have two penalties by 1h - that's frustrated.

Edited by Eulengesicht_2014, 05 June 2017 - 03:33 PM.

 
 
 
 

 


Eulengesicht_2014 #60 Posted 06 June 2017 - 12:31 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 96974 battles
  • 2,891
  • [DMX]
  • Member since:
    07-01-2014
Here the third punishment recorded by me at an obvious bot:

3. Penalty.png

Notice:

The "player" has become a penalty by "Unsporting Conduct", only 10

but not for "Inactivity by battle", 295 times 

This example has shown us: "Unsporting Conduct" is the most effective weapon by MH, like prammo ...

All other options are useless.

 

 

 


Edited by Eulengesicht_2014, 08 June 2017 - 04:26 PM.

 
 
 
 

 





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users