Jump to content


Military Honour - Becoming pain for High Magazine Reload time Tanks

Military Honour Unfair Rating By Players

  • Please log in to reply
14 replies to this topic

SGA786 #1 Posted 24 May 2017 - 09:52 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 25145 battles
  • 51
  • Member since:
    01-01-2015

Ok, so with current update we get to rate people based on various criterias. It's very promising feature and we all should appreciate it. But as any new feature this feature too has some glitches.

One I am facing is very annoying, I am currently playing with AMX 50 100 tank. Its  magazine reload time is 21-22 seconds. People are rating me "inactive in battle" which is absolutely unfair and annoying.

I even in battle always show my left reload time after every 4 shots but seems people don't about AMX Tanks and may be it's not their fault but they want to be trigger happy because i didn't shoot for 22 seconds. Now this is ironic. I hope there will be a proper review done and then only action taken based on those wrong ratings.


Edited by SGA786, 24 May 2017 - 09:53 PM.


1OOJA #2 Posted 24 May 2017 - 09:59 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 18580 battles
  • 391
  • [ALBAC]
  • Member since:
    02-06-2014

Why should we appreciate it?

I liked the idea at first but it proved really useless and prone to abuse.

As I sad in another thread earlier they should remove the negative down-vote things and leave only the positive ones because you cant abuse them, simply all players start from 1 star and if you are good and people respect you, they will upvote you, so you progress and go up, otherwise nothing will happen and you stay at one star.



SGA786 #3 Posted 24 May 2017 - 10:06 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 25145 battles
  • 51
  • Member since:
    01-01-2015

In a sense you are right but I am sure they must have balanced the ratio of rating. Let me explain, as I expect,1 Positive rating must be equal to 1.5 or 2 negative ratings. ( I wish it's like this else we are screwed I too have rough days ;) ).

So as you progress and receive ratings it will balance out. But I wonder if you get successful in pissing of your allies and enemies too :D

then only God of Tanks can only save you.


Edited by SGA786, 24 May 2017 - 10:07 PM.


Dr_Warren_Kruger #4 Posted 24 May 2017 - 10:53 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 10696 battles
  • 90
  • [LOONS]
  • Member since:
    06-15-2015

Well who could have possible predicted that the ability to neg people would be abused?

 

"No one knew a player rating system was this complicated, no one".

 

Hang on everyone knew that, it's just another new vector for stupid in a game where the smart players are barely playing right now or have already quit. All anyone wanted was to replace the worthless player rating with a 30 day WR to provide easy access to what a player is like -now- as opposed to their previous career as a cabbage.

 

Still now we can look forward to endless forum drama from people angry about being downrated.



SGA786 #5 Posted 24 May 2017 - 10:57 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 25145 battles
  • 51
  • Member since:
    01-01-2015
Dr I feel ya man. Lol, I know it's kind of drama but I won't like to be chat banned for 7 days because of few fools who don't understand Magazine reload time and other things. Let's grab some popcorn and wnjoy the drama.

Denii #6 Posted 25 May 2017 - 05:10 AM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 27603 battles
  • 1,320
  • [KS-AL]
  • Member since:
    04-12-2011

Just ignore the rating. It is WG's gift to noobs to make them feel important despite their failure to understand the game.

 

Just play the best you can, try to win and let the noobs play with the rating.


 


_Ripper4you_ #7 Posted 25 May 2017 - 05:13 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 61963 battles
  • 402
  • [EG-]
  • Member since:
    04-06-2013

View PostDenii, on 25 May 2017 - 07:10 AM, said:

Just ignore the rating. It is WG's gift to noobs to make them feel important despite their failure to understand the game.

 

Just play the best you can, try to win and let the noobs play with the rating.

 

5 star rating for that quote :teethhappy:

vwcampervanmarkuk #8 Posted 25 May 2017 - 06:19 AM

    Junior Sergeant

  • Player
  • 43542 battles
  • 174
  • [AFK]
  • Member since:
    12-25-2014
I actually upvoted an amx 100 yesterday.. Did good job and damage


Pitviper7 #9 Posted 25 May 2017 - 08:08 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 26458 battles
  • 19
  • [PICTI]
  • Member since:
    06-09-2011
I've just posted a topic on the same theme. Played five - six games and came top in all but one, which was won and I survived but came third. I checked my rating and besides the thumbs up I got earlier today, there is now an inactivity rating! :confused: Not possible if I've done most damage and most experience gained in all but one. I fought from the front in all but one game, and that I used to get round the flank and rear. :izmena:

SGA786 #10 Posted 26 May 2017 - 06:11 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 25145 battles
  • 51
  • Member since:
    01-01-2015
I have now realised people are so tippy. They can be offended even by you asking them to come not to block. I have started ignoring. Rating is a big distraction from playing your natural game.

wetterhoun #11 Posted 26 May 2017 - 06:28 AM

    Junior Sergeant

  • Player
  • 6870 battles
  • 141
  • Member since:
    02-11-2012
I like the idea. But the system is abused already by immature players with big egos. I currently have one inactive penalty against me... KV2 reload time is looooooooooooong... Sometimes the match is over before I can reload my second shot... And one unsportsmanlike or so. Because there was one jackass on our team that didn't like other team members killing reds. If claims are right I don't mind, but make sure you can't abuse it or get rid of it.

Edited by wetterhoun, 26 May 2017 - 06:29 AM.

REMOVE ALL BLOODY TIMERS! ...If you want my money again.


Just_merpug #12 Posted 26 May 2017 - 11:22 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 58371 battles
  • 10,287
  • [AFK]
  • Member since:
    03-05-2013
There are so few votes available, it'll settle down when people realise the real jerk is in a later game and they can't downvote him

Denoobing member of the Active Frontline Klan - and proud of it. Be nice to me..https://www.blitzstars.com/player/eu/Chairman_merpug


isaac5153 #13 Posted 26 May 2017 - 11:33 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 22604 battles
  • 2
  • [TARN]
  • Member since:
    06-28-2014

i am getting message that no rating because of 24 hr rule expiered s h i t e. but its instant int it. i want this so desparetley for afc people whoever and whatever excuse for not playing. its you play 

or you fight or dont play the game simples afc duz my head in. why,  just say am not here so

we know and can use u for cover.

 

 

 

 



Frodo_Nifinger #14 Posted 26 May 2017 - 11:35 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 66423 battles
  • 1,381
  • [AFK]
  • Member since:
    09-14-2014

View PostSGA786, on 24 May 2017 - 10:52 PM, said:

Ok, so with current update we get to rate people based on various criterias. It's very promising feature and we all should appreciate it. But as any new feature this feature too has some glitches.

One I am facing is very annoying, I am currently playing with AMX 50 100 tank. Its  magazine reload time is 21-22 seconds. People are rating me "inactive in battle" which is absolutely unfair and annoying.

I even in battle always show my left reload time after every 4 shots but seems people don't about AMX Tanks and may be it's not their fault but they want to be trigger happy because i didn't shoot for 22 seconds. Now this is ironic. I hope there will be a proper review done and then only action taken based on those wrong ratings.

 

just use the reload signal

and people will understand Why you retreat


The Hobbit is a proud member of

isaac5153 #15 Posted 26 May 2017 - 11:39 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 22604 battles
  • 2
  • [TARN]
  • Member since:
    06-28-2014
just think afc is proper sh it e and this may ban reg offenders so its gud




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users