Jump to content


MH is becoming really unfair

AFK Unfair Military Honour

  • Please log in to reply
115 replies to this topic

MiloIsSwift #21 Posted 30 May 2017 - 12:42 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 9874 battles
  • 14
  • [DTWZ]
  • Member since:
    07-29-2012

MH is definitely sketchy. I went to sleep last night with 6 positive and 3 negative, awoke this morning with 4 and 3. WTF? I actually gained 1% WR yesterday as well, so...who cares about ratings? I don't. I've seen where players have more positive votes than bad and it rewards them. I've also seen players with more neg than pos and still have a positive MH.

This MH crap makes zero sense. And yes it's being manipulated. You may as well be able to vote for yourself.



Elmo_Chipshop #22 Posted 30 May 2017 - 01:03 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 23367 battles
  • 1,317
  • [FTC-1]
  • Member since:
    08-16-2016

View Poststubbo66, on 30 May 2017 - 12:02 PM, said:

The biggest complaint I have is that you can't report the enemy for abuse...who cares if the reds are AFK, just makes your job easier.

 

And the other thing getting my goat are players who you rightly report for unsportsman like conduct who then see there have been reported and do it back to you.

 

The system needs to prevent retaliation if it's going to be of any use.

 

The system stinks, instead of Wargaming having a dedicated team to prevent abuse, AFK etc it's by introducing a system of self moderation. I would love to see how this pans out if certain high profile players get singled out for abuse I.e Mr Bushka for his contemptible behaviour during the 3.8 debacle.

 



illy #23 Posted 30 May 2017 - 02:58 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 18118 battles
  • 58
  • Member since:
    04-16-2011

View Postepcblue, on 30 May 2017 - 05:41 AM, said:

I've gotten 12 praises and no complaints for now, I think it might depend on your communication on battle if people get Edited agaisnt you or not. Thru certainly in my experience downvote you because you rekt their team

 

i just had 2 complaints of inactivity in a single battle just, fired 11 times and over 1000 of damage in my SU152........only 2 players did more damage......the system sucks and is totally open to abuse....another WG fail if you ask me

AndyHe #24 Posted 30 May 2017 - 03:03 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 14740 battles
  • 395
  • Member since:
    03-22-2015

View PostStripedCat97, on 29 May 2017 - 07:21 PM, said:

I have 5 complaints for being AFK while I was never AFK. This system is being abused by Edited kids. I've sent a ticket to WG.

 

edited kids? Why would people edit their child?

 


I like Type 62, that's why I want WG to give a huge discount on Type 59 so I can change my equipment on my Type 62

 

Homemade tinfoilhat--->https://youtu.be/_IEFaGiCm_8


petes85 #25 Posted 30 May 2017 - 04:07 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 44233 battles
  • 1,047
  • Member since:
    05-22-2014

View PostAndyHe, on 30 May 2017 - 05:03 PM, said:

 

edited kids? Why would people edit their child?

 

Blame WG for edited Kids 



MrFUNtastic #26 Posted 30 May 2017 - 05:48 PM

    Junior Sergeant

  • Player
  • 30149 battles
  • 185
  • [NASTY]
  • Member since:
    09-08-2015
Although I really couldn't care less what my honour rating is its easy to fix. All that needs to happen is two players have to give the same vote for it to count. So you get as many votes as you like but need a 2nd. This way it would stop any malicious voting by individuals and would stop people giving inactive if the person is swearing because that's all they have left in their complaints list. Currently the voting system isn't really reflective of what's happening during the game. 

GritG0d #27 Posted 30 May 2017 - 06:49 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 17035 battles
  • 10
  • [RTR2]
  • Member since:
    11-02-2014

My woes seem small in comparison to others, but just found a red thumb for provocative communication! The only thing I ever type is "Left?" Etc right at the beginning.

Think this MH system needs a serious overhaul. You need names of who has posted against you and a saved copy of the game. WoT will never do that, it would take a vast resource.  Why not just keep the green thumbs, which are harmless. The red thumbs seem to be wide open for abuse.  Requiring two or more players to both vote the same would be better.

As for being "inactive", what if your connection goes down.  Nothing you can do about it.

Best way to avoid this is to play at high tiers with grown ups who know that these things happen.

Perhaps have an "I only want to play with grown ups" choice on the settings :-)



Broadsword_ #28 Posted 30 May 2017 - 06:59 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 37351 battles
  • 345
  • [1RTR_]
  • Member since:
    04-03-2015

I have to agree, the system of self moderation is open to serious abuse. I picked up 3 negative responses today for no reason.

 

You can tell the system is bust when xenodium has 8 inactive in battle responses..... ludicrous!

 

Regards

 

Broadsword


In war it is the man that counts, and not only the machine. A good tank is useless unless the team inside it are well trained, and the men in the team have stout hearts and enthusiasm for the fight. Montgomery Nov 1944

 


____DILLIGAF____ #29 Posted 30 May 2017 - 07:00 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 69836 battles
  • 9
  • [YBA]
  • Member since:
    12-30-2014
I got 5 inactive. I have never been inactive. I got them because I chose to go in a different direction to the rest of the sheep and control freaks. Dont do what they want...get an inactive. 

jackalwolf_25052878 #30 Posted 30 May 2017 - 07:03 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 50741 battles
  • 44
  • [S_PM]
  • Member since:
    01-14-2016

View PostMiloIsSwift, on 30 May 2017 - 12:42 PM, said:

MH is definitely sketchy. I went to sleep last night with 6 positive and 3 negative, awoke this morning with 4 and 3. WTF? I actually gained 1% WR yesterday as well, so...who cares about ratings? I don't. I've seen where players have more positive votes than bad and it rewards them. I've also seen players with more neg than pos and still have a positive MH.

This MH crap makes zero sense. And yes it's being manipulated. You may as well be able to vote for yourself.

 

​YEAH mines gone from 20-1 to 14-1  what gives with that any one know ?????? and got I my complaint from a E100 that I tracked out for my team mates to blow up 

illy #31 Posted 30 May 2017 - 08:12 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 18118 battles
  • 58
  • Member since:
    04-16-2011

View Post____DILLIGAF____, on 30 May 2017 - 07:00 PM, said:

I got 5 inactive. I have never been inactive. I got them because I chose to go in a different direction to the rest of the sheep and control freaks. Dont do what they want...get an inactive. 

 

just got another inactive for doing more damage than the rest of the team put together.........good feature WG....you're making this game better by the patch lol

Eulengesicht_2014 #32 Posted 30 May 2017 - 08:23 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 133220 battles
  • 4,000
  • [WPS]
  • Member since:
    07-01-2014

View PostMiloIsSwift, on 30 May 2017 - 12:42 PM, said:

MH is definitely sketchy. I went to sleep last night with 6 positive and 3 negative, awoke this morning with 4 and 3. WTF? I actually gained 1% WR yesterday as well, so...who cares about ratings? I don't. I've seen where players have more positive votes than bad and it rewards them. I've also seen players with more neg than pos and still have a positive MH.

This MH crap makes zero sense. And yes it's being manipulated. You may as well be able to vote for yourself.

 

Maybe 6 positives votes from platoon service? This kind of votes disappears in a few days. Think the system works well ...
 
 
520438948.png
 

 
 
 
 
 

 


llo1 #33 Posted 30 May 2017 - 08:24 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 32157 battles
  • 7,723
  • [1RTR]
  • Member since:
    06-27-2014

I must join you all, just had a series of wins today ( mainly to or second damage) and one loss (to damage by a mile) and my definite "gung ho" approach, and somewhere in this someone posted an inactive comment. 

FFS......me inactive? They must need their heads seeing to!

Against my better judgement I have submitted a ticket, WG really need to actually use their brains to launch something that is so open to abuse!



llo1 #34 Posted 30 May 2017 - 08:26 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 32157 battles
  • 7,723
  • [1RTR]
  • Member since:
    06-27-2014

View PostEulengesicht_2014, on 30 May 2017 - 08:23 PM, said:

 

Maybe 6 positives votes from platoon service? This kind of votes disappears in a few days. Think the system works well ...

 

Eulengesicht........How the hell do you get 76627 battles and still have a life?

Eulengesicht_2014 #35 Posted 30 May 2017 - 08:29 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 133220 battles
  • 4,000
  • [WPS]
  • Member since:
    07-01-2014

View Postilly, on 30 May 2017 - 02:58 PM, said:

 

i just had 2 complaints of inactivity in a single battle just, fired 11 times and over 1000 of damage in my SU152........only 2 players did more damage......the system sucks and is totally open to abuse....another WG fail if you ask me

 

Your actually rating is:

9/4 by a *** Rating

so what's you problem, guy? No losses by the star rating!


 
 
520438948.png
 

 
 
 
 
 

 


Eulengesicht_2014 #36 Posted 30 May 2017 - 08:35 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 133220 battles
  • 4,000
  • [WPS]
  • Member since:
    07-01-2014

View PostBroadsword_, on 30 May 2017 - 06:59 PM, said:

I have to agree, the system of self moderation is open to serious abuse. I picked up 3 negative responses today for no reason.

 

You can tell the system is bust when xenodium has 8 inactive in battle responses..... ludicrous!

 

Regards

 

Broadsword

 

Your actually rating is:

13 against 3 negative votes by **** rating

So, what's your problem, guy! You go from *** to **** rating!

 

Xenodium actually 50 against 8 (Inactivity) by ***** general,  and you see: the system ignore the negative votes, think it's moving in the right direction ...


 
 
520438948.png
 

 
 
 
 
 

 


Eulengesicht_2014 #37 Posted 30 May 2017 - 08:38 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 133220 battles
  • 4,000
  • [WPS]
  • Member since:
    07-01-2014

View Post____DILLIGAF____, on 30 May 2017 - 07:00 PM, said:

I got 5 inactive. I have never been inactive. I got them because I chose to go in a different direction to the rest of the sheep and control freaks. Dont do what they want...get an inactive. 

 

Actually you have 11/7 by ***** rating - more is not possible

you see the system works very well, no * losses.


 
 
520438948.png
 

 
 
 
 
 

 


Eulengesicht_2014 #38 Posted 30 May 2017 - 08:38 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 133220 battles
  • 4,000
  • [WPS]
  • Member since:
    07-01-2014

View Postllo1, on 30 May 2017 - 08:26 PM, said:

 

Eulengesicht........How the hell do you get 76627 battles and still have a life?

 

Have you seen my start date? Think there are many people with more battles on the server ...

Edited by Eulengesicht_2014, 30 May 2017 - 08:40 PM.

 
 
520438948.png
 

 
 
 
 
 

 


Eulengesicht_2014 #39 Posted 30 May 2017 - 08:45 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 133220 battles
  • 4,000
  • [WPS]
  • Member since:
    07-01-2014

View PostStripedCat97, on 29 May 2017 - 07:21 PM, said:

I have 5 complaints for being AFK while I was never AFK. This system is being abused by Edited kids. I've sent a ticket to WG.

 

Yes, and here are your results:

34 against 5 negative votes and a ***** rating - you become higher and higher


 
 
520438948.png
 

 
 
 
 
 

 


llo1 #40 Posted 30 May 2017 - 09:14 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 32157 battles
  • 7,723
  • [1RTR]
  • Member since:
    06-27-2014

View PostEulengesicht_2014, on 30 May 2017 - 08:38 PM, said:

 

Have you seen my start date? Think there are many people with more battles on the server ...

 

I did notice it, 5 days after my start date!





Also tagged with AFK, Unfair, Military Honour

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users