Commanders,
Please leave your general feedback below in this topic.
Commanders,
Please leave your general feedback below in this topic.
The new hit markers are annoying. They're distracting, they get in the way when aiming and they look like the game is played on a really tacky arcade machine from the 90's.
Also, on behalf of players who play on phones, these new hit markers make it near impossible to play as they can't see where they're going on their smaller screens especially when being hit from multiple directions, as predicted before the update was released.
The standard radial hit marker should be the default.
(To those who want the old one back: Button on top left of garage > settings > Other > attack marker > set to Radial).
Edited by Skullcandy, 17 August 2017 - 09:01 AM.
Leader of 1RTR. | 1RTR on Discord | "Nothing in life is so exhilarating as to be shot at without result." – Winston Churchill
Hardly. If the standard is the default no one would try it out. This way you get familiar with the new option and as soon as you make up your mind you switch. For new players it might work better as they have less attention to give, so a big marker may help.
Anyway I don't like the big marker either, so have opted back.
Skullcandy, on 17 August 2017 - 08:59 AM, said:
The new hit markers are annoying. They're distracting, they get in the way when aiming and they look like the game is played on a really tacky arcade machine from the 90's.
Also, on behalf of players who play on phones, these new hit markers make it near impossible to play as they can't see where they're going on their smaller screens especially when being hit from multiple directions, as predicted before the update was released.
The standard radial hit marker should be the default.
(To those who want the old one back: Button on top left of garage > settings > Other > attack marker > set to Radial).
I play on the phone, but at least I know where I was hit. I have found it really useful.
On a laptop the markers are not so annoying to me but it is a good thing that one can switch to radial mode.
Otherwise, as expected nothing about the spare parts and we want our Mastery counter back (it is an easy one to change)!
WoT style hit indicator is what I have wished for long time, thanks. It was also brilliant idea of giving user an option to choose between old/new style and not to force to use only certain type. Also differentiating damage done by player with different color is nice update.
Consider disabling thumbs up/down feature in training rooms, since it can be abused.
Obj-140 with new camo shows as "Dread"
And it looks good.
Fv-183 with new camo shows as "Smashing"
And it looks good.
Both of these are shown to be different in the patch notes.
E100 new camo looks like it was done in 5minutes. Too dull and "E-100" markings is not very fitting as a military marking for it.
Add some more battle damage and another shade of black for camo.
This camo is not worth the premium price tag for it.
I like the tier spread for the missions but feel that the spread is too wide. V-X ?
A better split would have been by pairs. 10-9,8-7,6-5,4-3,2-1 or even a three split 10-7, 7-5, 5-3, 3-1 the rewards for spare Parts to be as for the lowest tier. Now to do the missions people will just play the tier 5 for the spare parts grind why bother with anything higher?
First thing I did was to disable the markers after the update and then, just now, I noticed that spare parts were reduced for completing missions ... I like the idea of doing missions with tanks from a range of tiers instead of one tier only but I'm not happy with the number of spare parts I get now for this.
Dans79Vet, on 17 August 2017 - 12:28 PM, said:
Obj-140 with new camo shows as "Dread"
And it looks good.
Fv-183 with new camo shows as "Smashing"
And it looks good.
Both of these are shown to be different in the patch notes.
E100 new camo looks like it was done in 5minutes. Too dull and "E-100" markings is not very fitting as a military marking for it.
Add some more battle damage and another shade of black for camo.
This camo is not worth the premium price tag for it.
Agree with this and would add that Hammer is what the Camo is meant to be called in battle, smashing sounds like a 1940s black and white film, as in '........well that's smashing Roger, jolly good show.'
Dans79Vet, on 17 August 2017 - 12:28 PM, said:
Obj-140 with new camo shows as "Dread"
And it looks good.
Fv-183 with new camo shows as "Smashing"
And it looks good.
Both of these are shown to be different in the patch notes.
E100 new camo looks like it was done in 5minutes. Too dull and "E-100" markings is not very fitting as a military marking for it.
Add some more battle damage and another shade of black for camo.
This camo is not worth the premium price tag for it.
Hmm. Camo E-100 is best of all for me.
Dans79Vet, on 17 August 2017 - 12:28 PM, said:
Obj-140 with new camo shows as "Dread"
And it looks good.
Fv-183 with new camo shows as "Smashing"
And it looks good.
Both of these are shown to be different in the patch notes.
E100 new camo looks like it was done in 5minutes. Too dull and "E-100" markings is not very fitting as a military marking for it.
Add some more battle damage and another shade of black for camo.
This camo is not worth the premium price tag for it.
Thanks.
I was searching for the new Dread tank specs. Sorted!
Edited by MeanPrincess, 17 August 2017 - 04:24 PM.
- [NOOBS] -
0 members, 5 guests, 0 anonymous users