Jump to content


WG please give the Chinese IS-2 it's historical gun.

IS2 122MM IS-2 122mm

  • Please log in to reply
23 replies to this topic

Poll: Chinese IS-2 with the D25T? (12 members have cast votes)

You have to complete 250 battles in order to participate this poll.

Should we add the historical 122mm D25T to the Chinese IS-2?

  1. Yes, IS and Russian IS-2 have that gun as well. (5 votes [41.67%])

    Percentage of vote: 41.67%

  2. No, give it the historical D 2-5T for balancing purposes (2 votes [16.67%])

    Percentage of vote: 16.67%

  3. No, only Russians can have those gun. (5 votes [41.67%])

    Percentage of vote: 41.67%

Vote Hide poll

JoyV #1 Posted 10 April 2018 - 08:15 AM

    Junior Sergeant

  • Player
  • 13049 battles
  • 221
  • [301ST]
  • Member since:
    12-06-2015

Ok. I do understand that WG told us to make the IS-2 different from the Russian IS-2, but they made the worst decision they could make. They made it ''different'' by giving it an ugly fake chinese gun instead of the mighty D-25T. I have 2 issues with this:

 

The gun looks awful on the tank. The 122 looks more like a swollen 85mm. IS-2 never had this piece of crap. I suggest that WG gives the IS-2 it's true gun: The D-25T or at least the D-2-5T. PC has this gun as well and it is not OP at all. It makes the IS-2 look more intimidating as well. The chinese IS-2 is worse than the IS-2 and even the IS!  I think the only reason for WG not to add this gun is because chinese tanks need to be ''crap'' compared to russian tanks. I hope the developers read this and understand what mistake they made. This game looks more and more like a joke compared to PC. If WG keeps removing unbroken and historical guns i may be looking for a new game soon.....

 

download.jpg

We need this gun!

 

 


Dead.

jonty_2014 #2 Posted 10 April 2018 - 09:09 AM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 59714 battles
  • 4,625
  • [EMRS]
  • Member since:
    09-23-2014
Have you driven it ?

 


JoyV #3 Posted 10 April 2018 - 09:19 AM

    Junior Sergeant

  • Player
  • 13049 battles
  • 221
  • [301ST]
  • Member since:
    12-06-2015

View Postjonty_2014, on 10 April 2018 - 10:09 AM, said:

Have you driven it ?

 

No. Only the the Russian IS. But the stats are clearly worse.
Dead.

talhaONE #4 Posted 10 April 2018 - 09:55 AM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 15664 battles
  • 2,873
  • [CZZR]
  • Member since:
    09-26-2016
Chinese ıs2 is clearly worse then russian ıs2 because fck balance.

ponedelj #5 Posted 10 April 2018 - 10:30 AM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Player
  • 13701 battles
  • 519
  • [LV-S]
  • Member since:
    11-05-2013
Ao Emm... Why IS2??? There is already IS2... And in fact thats its prem make new IS2 somehow strange.  I think it will not have destructur... Why? Because Prem IS2 have it... so how about all the snowflake who have Prem IS2? Why to have prem ig there is Cheap China Analog?

Titus_Scato #6 Posted 10 April 2018 - 11:28 AM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 39440 battles
  • 7,704
  • [1RTR]
  • Member since:
    10-18-2014
Agreed, the Chinese IS-2 should be the same as it is in PC.  The difference between the Chinese IS-2 and the Russian IS-2 is that the Chinese one should have a less powerful top engine, only 600 hp instead of 700 hp, and it should have 50 more hitpoints.  Plus of course the 100 mm stock gun and the Chinese 122 mm.

romsitsa #7 Posted 10 April 2018 - 01:49 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 41339 battles
  • 4,455
  • [VG]
  • Member since:
    10-19-2011

Aimtime is 7,6 sec (maybe different, but close to the KV-2) for the 122 mm, that can't be right?

 

A



ponedelj #8 Posted 10 April 2018 - 01:52 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Player
  • 13701 battles
  • 519
  • [LV-S]
  • Member since:
    11-05-2013

For me problem is not the stats (yes they should be worse) But in name... Maybe Mao-2???

 



RustyRaptor #9 Posted 10 April 2018 - 02:05 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Player
  • 5266 battles
  • 664
  • [H1GH]
  • Member since:
    08-28-2017

>Wargaming

>Historical accuracy

You're barking at the wrong tree here.If you want historical accuracy go play another game.



jonty_2014 #10 Posted 10 April 2018 - 02:39 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 59714 battles
  • 4,625
  • [EMRS]
  • Member since:
    09-23-2014
Well, we have the tech tree IS, which for all intents and purposes is an IS; we have the premium IS-2, plus in the Russian tech tree a D-2-5T armed tank at tier 6, and another D-25T armed tank at tier VII (the KV-1S and KV-3) - so I’m OK with making the Chinese IS a bit different.

I’ll try it, I may not like it, but it’s worth a drive.

 


JoyV #11 Posted 10 April 2018 - 04:24 PM

    Junior Sergeant

  • Player
  • 13049 battles
  • 221
  • [301ST]
  • Member since:
    12-06-2015

View Postromsitsa, on 10 April 2018 - 02:49 PM, said:

Aimtime is 7,6 sec (maybe different, but close to the KV-2) for the 122 mm, that can't be right?

 

A

 

KV-2 has better aim time - because Stalin wants it.
Dead.

JoyV #12 Posted 10 April 2018 - 04:25 PM

    Junior Sergeant

  • Player
  • 13049 battles
  • 221
  • [301ST]
  • Member since:
    12-06-2015

View PostRustyRaptor, on 10 April 2018 - 03:05 PM, said:

>Wargaming

>Historical accuracy

You're barking at the wrong tree here.If you want historical accuracy go play another game.

 

I only want that WG replaces this silly looking gun on the IS-2
Dead.

_FREE__SQU1RREL_ #13 Posted 10 April 2018 - 04:27 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Player
  • 32545 battles
  • 702
  • [DSK1L]
  • Member since:
    08-27-2013
hello i am living in a cave and i dont know where do you get all these stats about chinese heavies?

LanguishViking #14 Posted 10 April 2018 - 05:22 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Player
  • 11098 battles
  • 533
  • [NOR]
  • Member since:
    10-15-2015
RASHA STRONGK!!!!!11111oneoneone


romsitsa #15 Posted 10 April 2018 - 06:03 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 41339 battles
  • 4,455
  • [VG]
  • Member since:
    10-19-2011

View PostJoyV, on 10 April 2018 - 04:25 PM, said:

 

I only want that WG replaces this silly looking gun on the IS-2

 

If the gun looks the same, there will be two, visually identical tanks in game. It won't happen.

 

A



Titus_Scato #16 Posted 10 April 2018 - 06:09 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 39440 battles
  • 7,704
  • [1RTR]
  • Member since:
    10-18-2014

View Postromsitsa, on 10 April 2018 - 06:03 PM, said:

 

If the gun looks the same, there will be two, visually identical tanks in game. It won't happen.

 

A

 

why not?  T-34 with 57 mm gun and Type T-34 with 57 mm gun look identical.

romsitsa #17 Posted 10 April 2018 - 06:30 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 41339 battles
  • 4,455
  • [VG]
  • Member since:
    10-19-2011

Nope, different wheels. Kuro and Kame would be similar to their German counterparts, but the skin is unique to them.

 

A



Titus_Scato #18 Posted 10 April 2018 - 09:02 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 39440 battles
  • 7,704
  • [1RTR]
  • Member since:
    10-18-2014

View Postromsitsa, on 10 April 2018 - 06:30 PM, said:

Nope, different wheels. Kuro and Kame would be similar to their German counterparts, but the skin is unique to them.

 

A

 

OK, how about T-34-85 and Type 58?  Both with stock turret and 85 mm S-53 gun?

Edited by Titus_Scato, 10 April 2018 - 09:12 PM.


romsitsa #19 Posted 10 April 2018 - 09:21 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 41339 battles
  • 4,455
  • [VG]
  • Member since:
    10-19-2011

Spare track on frontal armor. Nuances, but all vehicles are different.

 

A


Edited by romsitsa, 10 April 2018 - 09:21 PM.


Titus_Scato #20 Posted 10 April 2018 - 09:42 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 39440 battles
  • 7,704
  • [1RTR]
  • Member since:
    10-18-2014

View Postromsitsa, on 10 April 2018 - 09:21 PM, said:

Spare track on frontal armor. Nuances, but all vehicles are different.

 

A

 

OK then, the Chinese IS-2 has fuel drums on the rear hull sides, the Russian IS-2 has logs.

 

So they aren't identical, and wouldn't be even if the Chinese IS-2 had the 122 mm D-2-5T gun.

 

Gotcha!  :P







Also tagged with IS2, 122MM, IS-2, 122mm

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users