Jump to content


type 59 needs a buff


  • Please log in to reply
76 replies to this topic

Poll: Does the type 59 need a buff? (60 members have cast votes)

You have to complete 250 battles in order to participate this poll.

Does the type 59 beed a buff?

  1. Yes (23 votes [38.33%])

    Percentage of vote: 38.33%

  2. No (34 votes [56.67%])

    Percentage of vote: 56.67%

  3. i dont care... (3 votes [5.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 5.00%

Vote Hide poll

SinFFX1 #1 Posted 13 June 2018 - 09:37 PM

    Junior Sergeant

  • Player
  • 11937 battles
  • 195
  • [REV1S]
  • Member since:
    04-21-2018

i really love this little thing, and i think its worth it ( i really wanted a medium premium for farming) .

 

BUT  it is so bad compared to regular premiums ,i even struggle against tier 7 (tiger 1) or other tanks for example t43.. becouse they have higher dpm and most of the time they can pen your hull unless its really hard angled.

 

How would a buff look like ?

 

1 option : Buff its DPM

2 option : Buff its Penetration

3 option : Buff the general hull armor

 

what are your thoughts? i really like opinions from people who actually have the tank, or have faced it enough in match making

 



talhaONE #2 Posted 13 June 2018 - 10:03 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 14438 battles
  • 2,741
  • [CZZR]
  • Member since:
    09-26-2016

 

This is what you get for the crappy dpm and accuracy.-7 gun depression and a strong asş piece of shıt turret that literally stronger then most of the tier 8 heavies turrets.

 

Now please stop wanting buff for type59.Its already enough stronk.



qurrel99 #3 Posted 13 June 2018 - 10:05 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Player
  • 28119 battles
  • 622
  • [DSK1L]
  • Member since:
    08-27-2013
no need for buff it is very powerful as it is, try to drive t-44-100 and will see what is a weak tank like

kaptain_kookaburra #4 Posted 14 June 2018 - 03:23 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 29917 battles
  • 84
  • [-FLY]
  • Member since:
    02-24-2016
U got a 64% winrate in the tank and think still it needs a buff?


 


_S_H_O_G_U_N_ #5 Posted 14 June 2018 - 06:10 AM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 29038 battles
  • 1,080
  • [XS]
  • Member since:
    01-18-2015

View Postqurrel99, on 13 June 2018 - 10:05 PM, said:

no need for buff it is very powerful as it is, try to drive t-44-100 and will see what is a weak tank like

 

Yeah lol playing T44-100 feels like being punished for the hard work you did to grind the tank lol

Edited by _S_H_O_G_U_N_, 14 June 2018 - 06:11 AM.


 


romsitsa #6 Posted 14 June 2018 - 06:56 AM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 39359 battles
  • 4,174
  • [VG]
  • Member since:
    10-19-2011

It's a T-54 with less DPM, hull armor, pen and mobility in tier VIII. It doesn't need any buff.

 

A



__Nikolaus__ #7 Posted 14 June 2018 - 08:16 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 36606 battles
  • 458
  • [TR_MP]
  • Member since:
    12-06-2014

View Postromsitsa, on 14 June 2018 - 09:56 AM, said:

It's a T-54 with less DPM, hull armor, pen and mobility in tier VIII. It doesn't need any buff.

 

A

 

i played over 1000 games with this tank. Last 6 months ? 5 maybe. After the %10 reload time change this tank reload 8.3 second which is sucks. İt needs a dpm buff. İts already slow. Mod 1 is way better with 8.0 reload.

Türkçe anlatımlı Blitz videolar için buraya https://www.youtube....8TtR_eO-MCHVFCQ


TrolLoLX #8 Posted 14 June 2018 - 08:21 AM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Player
  • 566 battles
  • 849
  • [VIN]
  • Member since:
    09-01-2012
Fact that mod1 is the best medium killer in T8 doesn't make type59 weak. It doesn't need buff.

 


romsitsa #9 Posted 14 June 2018 - 08:29 AM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 39359 battles
  • 4,174
  • [VG]
  • Member since:
    10-19-2011

View Post__Nikolaus__, on 14 June 2018 - 08:16 AM, said:

 

i played over 1000 games with this tank. Last 6 months ? 5 maybe. After the %10 reload time change this tank reload 8.3 second which is sucks. İt needs a dpm buff. İts already slow. Mod 1 is way better with 8.0 reload.

 

3%, legit.

 

A



_S_H_O_G_U_N_ #10 Posted 14 June 2018 - 09:38 AM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 29038 battles
  • 1,080
  • [XS]
  • Member since:
    01-18-2015

View Post__Nikolaus__, on 14 June 2018 - 08:16 AM, said:

 

i played over 1000 games with this tank. Last 6 months ? 5 maybe. After the %10 reload time change this tank reload 8.3 second which is sucks. İt needs a dpm buff. İts already slow. Mod 1 is way better with 8.0 reload.

 

T54mod1 is just broken and comparing it to one of the most broken tanks in the game is not a great idea


 


jylpah #11 Posted 14 June 2018 - 09:40 AM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 12229 battles
  • 3,822
  • [AFK]
  • Member since:
    08-05-2014

I actually think Type 59 is not that good. I know I suck with it, but compared to many other tier VIII meds, Type 59 is not that good. It is sluggish, DPM is low, gun handling quite bad. Of course it is fantastic if you happen to have a game where you can be hull-down and have targets you can hit and pen, but that's not always the case. T-44, T-54 Mod 1, T69, Pershing are all better than Type 59. IMHO.

 

Thanks for making a thread so I did not have to make it :great:

 

But in general the Tier VIII meta is very Heavy-dominated. It's easy to carry games in a heavy, with anything else it is difficult.


"WG does not balance tanks, they design imbalance into the game instead."

Jylpah @EU  Jylpah @Asia  Tier V-X Tank Ranking      Jylpah is SKUX


Chairman_merpug #12 Posted 14 June 2018 - 12:00 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 34056 battles
  • 7,386
  • [AFK]
  • Member since:
    03-05-2013

View Postjylpah, on 14 June 2018 - 09:40 AM, said:

I actually think Type 59 is not that good. I know I suck with it, but compared to many other tier VIII meds, Type 59 is not that good. It is sluggish, DPM is low, gun handling quite bad. Of course it is fantastic if you happen to have a game where you can be hull-down and have targets you can hit and pen, but that's not always the case. T-44, T-54 Mod 1, T69, Pershing are all better than Type 59. IMHO.

 

Thanks for making a thread so I did not have to make it :great:

 

But in general the Tier VIII meta is very Heavy-dominated. It's easy to carry games in a heavy, with anything else it is difficult.

That makes me feel better... 


Denoobing member of the Active Frontline Klan - and proud of it.

Be nice to me..

http://www.blitzstar...r/eu/mrpgilbert


talhaONE #13 Posted 14 June 2018 - 01:36 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 14438 battles
  • 2,741
  • [CZZR]
  • Member since:
    09-26-2016

View Post__Nikolaus__, on 14 June 2018 - 10:16 AM, said:

 

i played over 1000 games with this tank. Last 6 months ? 5 maybe. After the %10 reload time change this tank reload 8.3 second which is sucks. İt needs a dpm buff. İts already slow. Mod 1 is way better with 8.0 reload.

Type 59 is clearly not a slow medium. It has 17 p/w ratio on medium terrain which is clearly good.When compared to mod1 yeah it has worse dpm but it has better penetration and gun depression.



talhaONE #14 Posted 14 June 2018 - 01:39 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 14438 battles
  • 2,741
  • [CZZR]
  • Member since:
    09-26-2016

View Postjylpah, on 14 June 2018 - 11:40 AM, said:

I actually think Type 59 is not that good. I know I suck with it, but compared to many other tier VIII meds, Type 59 is not that good. It is sluggish, DPM is low, gun handling quite bad. Of course it is fantastic if you happen to have a game where you can be hull-down and have targets you can hit and pen, but that's not always the case. T-44, T-54 Mod 1, T69, Pershing are all better than Type 59. IMHO.

 

Thanks for making a thread so I did not have to make it :great:

 

But in general the Tier VIII meta is very Heavy-dominated. It's easy to carry games in a heavy, with anything else it is difficult.

TYPE 59 IS NOT SLUGGISH.ITS ENGINE IS WEAK BUT IT HAS GREAT TERRAIN RESISTANCE VALUES UNLIKE ANY OTHER T-XXX TANK.STOP TELLING TYPE 59 IS SLOW BLAH BLAH BECAUSE ITS NOT.



Vedrfoelnir #15 Posted 14 June 2018 - 01:46 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Player
  • 32072 battles
  • 647
  • [AFK]
  • Member since:
    10-23-2016
Buff it please. :)

JJSawry #16 Posted 14 June 2018 - 03:14 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 26960 battles
  • 1,705
  • [EU]
  • Member since:
    11-21-2016
How about no? Wasn't it hype59 and mod1 that were leading in wr in t8 meds? By a large margin?

TheNoobDeleter1 #17 Posted 14 June 2018 - 04:23 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 8123 battles
  • 41
  • [EO]
  • Member since:
    06-25-2016
Need a BIG buff. Cant pen side of IS-3 with AP, hull gets penned most of the time,only tier 7 stocks bounce.
DPM,Pen and Engine buff.
Increase alpha to 350, increase pen by 20mm and double HP of engine

qurrel99 #18 Posted 14 June 2018 - 04:28 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Player
  • 28119 battles
  • 622
  • [DSK1L]
  • Member since:
    08-27-2013

View PostTheNoobDeleter1, on 14 June 2018 - 07:23 PM, said:

Need a BIG buff. Cant pen side of IS-3 with AP, hull gets penned most of the time,only tier 7 stocks bounce.
DPM,Pen and Engine buff.
Increase alpha to 350, increase pen by 20mm and double HP of engine

 

350  is too low i think it needs at least 640 and nobody would mind 10 times more engine power as well

 

ps: my post as serious as the one above



bulletdreetn #19 Posted 14 June 2018 - 04:33 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 11759 battles
  • 99
  • [_D_A_]
  • Member since:
    03-28-2012
Needs nerf haha

superschnitzelkoenig #20 Posted 14 June 2018 - 04:36 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 41957 battles
  • 2,892
  • [RA1D]
  • Member since:
    12-30-2014
Pershing better than Type 59?! Erm...

 

Stop Complaining...           ...Carry Harder!





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users