Jump to content


Type 59 needs buff


  • Please log in to reply
16 replies to this topic

Aquantis #1 Posted 02 July 2018 - 04:10 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 3860 battles
  • 15
  • Member since:
    07-13-2014
Type 59 needs buff unequivocally! 

VonPottypoop #2 Posted 02 July 2018 - 06:09 AM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 16476 battles
  • 1,144
  • [FTC-1]
  • Member since:
    08-16-2016

View PostAquantis, on 02 July 2018 - 04:10 AM, said:

Type 59 needs buff unequivocally! 

 

It’s one of the best meds out there if not the best at that tier, sure it struggles against higher tiers and broken Tds but what doesn’t?

​Very proud leader of the Fun-Tan-Clan 


Mjr_Eazy #3 Posted 02 July 2018 - 06:40 AM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 19126 battles
  • 3,373
  • [BT_SV]
  • Member since:
    04-26-2017

Is Talha-itis contagious?  I thought it was non-communicable and Talha was only known case, I guess not...

 

I’m sure it will evolve like all these threads, some people can play the tank and think it’s fine, others struggle in it and blame the tank rather than learn to git gud in it...  I picked 3 other meds at random on blitzstars and it’s WR and average damage was better than them so, is the tank?  Is it really?


He who stops being better stops being good.  Oliver Cromwell I was soundly beaten, and i am the better for it.  Monty

I keep getting beaten but getting better so its all good man :harp:. Major Eazy


qurrel99 #4 Posted 03 July 2018 - 10:08 AM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Player
  • 30840 battles
  • 656
  • [DSK1L]
  • Member since:
    08-27-2013
omg this is 3rd time same thread opened no it doesnt need buff it has great armor especially on turret and 7 degrees of gun depression you cant expect a better mobility or better dpm on a tank like that

The_Mighty_Wombat #5 Posted 03 July 2018 - 04:23 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 34257 battles
  • 1,972
  • [-GNA-]
  • Member since:
    11-07-2014

Type 59 isnt even showing in their garage.

So where do you feel it is let down?

Where is your play record in it to see where you can improve.

 

pointless thread for no reason.



superschnitzelkoenig #6 Posted 04 July 2018 - 09:40 AM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 44066 battles
  • 3,385
  • [RA1D]
  • Member since:
    12-30-2014
No

 

Stop Complaining...           ...Carry Harder!


Ace_Camper #7 Posted 09 September 2018 - 11:49 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 29956 battles
  • 485
  • Member since:
    07-07-2014

Yes,

 

it does, slight mobility, RoF and aim time buff would be great.



I_AMADEUS_I #8 Posted 23 September 2018 - 07:44 AM

    Junior Sergeant

  • Player
  • 33969 battles
  • 100
  • [L1VE]
  • Member since:
    02-04-2017

If I'd talk as a player who has played w/ near all mediums in tier 8 with high stats and a recent owner of Type 59, I'd say "Yes, It exactly needs a buff to it's DPM". Mobility is okayish IMO but w/ this DPM, this tank cannot do his job.



superschnitzelkoenig #9 Posted 11 October 2018 - 01:00 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 44066 battles
  • 3,385
  • [RA1D]
  • Member since:
    12-30-2014
Just doesn't make sense. Why should a tank with a very good armour profile, good mobility and high Alpha have the same DPM like - let's say - a FCM 50 with worse Alpha, huge profile, worse mobility and no reliable armour? The T-34-2/3 have 250 less DPM and are worse in every aspect apart of Alpha and work fine.

 

Stop Complaining...           ...Carry Harder!


Wildoneshelper #10 Posted 11 October 2018 - 04:59 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 8324 battles
  • 302
  • [GNEIS]
  • Member since:
    11-11-2017
Yes buff it so we can spam it in tours! :great:

A dedicated hater of KV-2 since day one. (Unpopular opinion :P )


VonPottypoop #11 Posted 12 October 2018 - 06:28 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 16476 battles
  • 1,144
  • [FTC-1]
  • Member since:
    08-16-2016
I personally think premium tanks should all be a little bit more special these days as Credits have become so easy to get. If you pay you should get something special, if you can’t play anyway you would still get found out quickly. When you think about it the game is pretty Unique, you actually pay for something that’s not quite as good as the Tech tree free tanks, strange folk these Belarusian’s.

Edited by VonPottypoop, 12 October 2018 - 06:57 PM.

​Very proud leader of the Fun-Tan-Clan 


Titus_Scato #12 Posted 12 October 2018 - 11:16 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 39161 battles
  • 7,603
  • [1RTR]
  • Member since:
    10-18-2014

View PostAce_Camper, on 09 September 2018 - 11:49 AM, said:

Yes,

 

it does, slight mobility, RoF and aim time buff would be great.

 

No - just the aim time.  Has the same gun as the T-34-2, penetration wise, but horrifically worse aim time.

 

The Type 59 has less mobility than the T-34-2, but that is compensated for with more armour, particularly the hull front and sides.



superschnitzelkoenig #13 Posted 13 October 2018 - 09:30 AM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 44066 battles
  • 3,385
  • [RA1D]
  • Member since:
    12-30-2014

View PostTitus_Scato, on 12 October 2018 - 11:16 PM, said:

 

No - just the aim time.  Has the same gun as the T-34-2, penetration wise, but horrifically worse aim time.

 

The Type 59 has less mobility than the T-34-2, but that is compensated for with more armour, particularly the hull front and sides.

 

It has worse aim time but much, much better dispersion in the move and 2deg more gun depression. Using the 100mm gun the T-34-2 is a significantly worse tank than the Type 59.

 

Stop Complaining...           ...Carry Harder!


Titus_Scato #14 Posted 13 October 2018 - 01:12 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 39161 battles
  • 7,603
  • [1RTR]
  • Member since:
    10-18-2014

View Postsuperschnitzelkoenig, on 13 October 2018 - 09:30 AM, said:

 

It has worse aim time but much, much better dispersion in the move and 2deg more gun depression. Using the 100mm gun the T-34-2 is a significantly worse tank than the Type 59.

 

That’s a good point.  The Type 59 has the same gun depression as the T-44, and slightly better dispersion on the move to the T-34-1, which it doesn’t deserve.  

 

However, I still think its aim time should be buffed from a base of 2.4 (without equipment or food) to 2.21, same as the T-34-1 and the T-44.  (That’s a 9% buff.)



alessh77 #15 Posted 14 October 2018 - 10:04 AM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Player
  • 41984 battles
  • 524
  • [SLO-1]
  • Member since:
    05-07-2016
T-54 Mod1 also needs to be buffed!
 ::::::::::::::::::: Got plenty empty garage slots for storing spare parts :::::::::::::::::: 

Mjr_Eazy #16 Posted 14 October 2018 - 09:14 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 19126 battles
  • 3,373
  • [BT_SV]
  • Member since:
    04-26-2017

View Postalessh77, on 14 October 2018 - 10:04 AM, said:

T-54 Mod1 also needs to be buffed!

 

rofl, good one :)

He who stops being better stops being good.  Oliver Cromwell I was soundly beaten, and i am the better for it.  Monty

I keep getting beaten but getting better so its all good man :harp:. Major Eazy


VonPottypoop #17 Posted 14 October 2018 - 10:55 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 16476 battles
  • 1,144
  • [FTC-1]
  • Member since:
    08-16-2016

View Postalessh77, on 14 October 2018 - 10:04 AM, said:

T-54 Mod1 also needs to be buffed!

 

It would be nice if it had a little more gun depression.

​Very proud leader of the Fun-Tan-Clan 





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users