Jump to content


WG 121b possible bug ? It is NOT enriched ?


  • Please log in to reply
34 replies to this topic

ballist1x #1 Posted 09 February 2019 - 03:45 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Player
  • 14172 battles
  • 542
  • [WILD]
  • Member since:
    12-04-2016

Hi the 121b is meant to be an enriched not premium tank. 

 

However the credit co efficient is 90% which is not an enriched co efficient.

 

Can WG confirm it's mean to be enriched and that the tanks in game co efficient is working  correctly?


Edited by ballist1x, 09 February 2019 - 04:50 PM.


Mjr_Eazy #2 Posted 09 February 2019 - 03:53 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 23311 battles
  • 4,565
  • [BT_SV]
  • Member since:
    04-26-2017

View Postballist1x, on 09 February 2019 - 03:45 PM, said:

Hi the 121b is meant to be an enriched not premium tank. 

 

However the credit co efficient is 90% which is not an enriched co efficient.

 

Can WG confirm it's mean to be enriched and that the tanks in game co efficient is working  correctly?

 

it wouldn’t suprise me if that is right, it is WG after all, I’d suggest you raise a ticket with support as no one from WG will respond here...

He who stops being better stops being good.  Oliver Cromwell I was soundly beaten, and i am the better for it.  Monty

I keep getting beaten but getting better so its all good man :harp:. Major Eazy


ballist1x #3 Posted 09 February 2019 - 04:05 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Player
  • 14172 battles
  • 542
  • [WILD]
  • Member since:
    12-04-2016

Thanks will do. Proof that it should be enriched here 

 

Posted Image



Cornish_Dyowl #4 Posted 09 February 2019 - 05:32 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Player
  • 31379 battles
  • 808
  • [AFK]
  • Member since:
    06-28-2014

View Postballist1x, on 09 February 2019 - 03:45 PM, said:

Hi the 121b is meant to be an enriched not premium tank. 

 

However the credit co efficient is 90% which is not an enriched co efficient.

 

Can WG confirm it's mean to be enriched and that the tanks in game co efficient is working  correctly?

 

It is when compared with the other tier 10 meds, with credit coefficients of between 80-85%.

   Proud to be a Deputy Lead of AFK / IRMA.


ballist1x #5 Posted 09 February 2019 - 05:35 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Player
  • 14172 battles
  • 542
  • [WILD]
  • Member since:
    12-04-2016

View PostCornish_Dyowl, on 09 February 2019 - 05:32 PM, said:

 

It is when compared with the other tier 10 meds, with credit coefficients of between 80-85%.

 

 

10% enrichment ,?

 

When you enrich a t10 med you get an extra 67%...



ballist1x #6 Posted 09 February 2019 - 05:46 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Player
  • 14172 battles
  • 542
  • [WILD]
  • Member since:
    12-04-2016

An enriched t62a for example would be 85% base plus 67%

Posted Image

The 121b is not being enriched.

 

I'd expect at least 40-50% enrichment which would put it on par with the enriched mk6 chieftain.


Edited by ballist1x, 09 February 2019 - 05:57 PM.


Mjr_Eazy #7 Posted 09 February 2019 - 06:13 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 23311 battles
  • 4,565
  • [BT_SV]
  • Member since:
    04-26-2017

The way it is worded you would expect the enriched 121b to be as good as or even better than an enriched t-62a

Will be interesting to see what they say to your ticket!


He who stops being better stops being good.  Oliver Cromwell I was soundly beaten, and i am the better for it.  Monty

I keep getting beaten but getting better so its all good man :harp:. Major Eazy


ballist1x #8 Posted 09 February 2019 - 06:51 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Player
  • 14172 battles
  • 542
  • [WILD]
  • Member since:
    12-04-2016

View PostMjr_Eazy, on 09 February 2019 - 06:13 PM, said:

The way it is worded you would expect the enriched 121b to be as good as or even better than an enriched t-62a

Will be interesting to see what they say to your ticket!

 

 

The standard 121 in the tech tree has 81% co efficient so the 121b is getting a while 9%...

 

Something is just not right about the way the tank is being sold or it's credit co efficient is incoherent in game.

 

This is how WG has worded the 121b which.makes me think they are not giving it the Correct credits co efficient 

 

Posted Image

 

@cornish_dyowl


Edited by ballist1x, 09 February 2019 - 11:14 PM.


Banquo__ #9 Posted 12 February 2019 - 08:36 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 23235 battles
  • 8
  • [RIGCZ]
  • Member since:
    09-12-2016
Yep, I got it and since 21st of December and was surprised as you are. I get used to it, but TBH it feels like we get screwed and you can't even make it enriched what is soooo damn funny. Because you get a (kind of) Premium tank which brings you... no money. The only argument why I didn't write to WG is I actually like this tank and had no time to do this. But it should be enriched some way.

ballist1x #10 Posted 12 February 2019 - 10:38 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Player
  • 14172 battles
  • 542
  • [WILD]
  • Member since:
    12-04-2016

View PostBanquo__, on 12 February 2019 - 08:36 PM, said:

Yep, I got it and since 21st of December and was surprised as you are. I get used to it, but TBH it feels like we get screwed and you can't even make it enriched what is soooo damn funny. Because you get a (kind of) Premium tank which brings you... no money. The only argument why I didn't write to WG is I actually like this tank and had no time to do this. But it should be enriched some way.

 

 

Please write a ticket to WG and see what they say. Originally they gave me the generic, "credits earnt depend on how you play the game blah blah" so I've replied and sent them a load of info like this screen shot below showing the 121b vs other "enriched" T10 and T9 tanks...

 

Only if many.people start to bring this to WG attention.might they fix it.

 

Posted Image


Edited by ballist1x, 12 February 2019 - 10:44 PM.


Mjr_Eazy #11 Posted 13 February 2019 - 12:58 AM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 23311 battles
  • 4,565
  • [BT_SV]
  • Member since:
    04-26-2017

I’ll do a ticket too tomorrow...


He who stops being better stops being good.  Oliver Cromwell I was soundly beaten, and i am the better for it.  Monty

I keep getting beaten but getting better so its all good man :harp:. Major Eazy


ballist1x #12 Posted 13 February 2019 - 07:55 AM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Player
  • 14172 battles
  • 542
  • [WILD]
  • Member since:
    12-04-2016

View PostMjr_Eazy, on 13 February 2019 - 12:58 AM, said:

I’ll do a ticket too tomorrow...

 

 

Good lad, no matter what anyone's opinions on T10 premium/enriched tanks is, whoever bought the 121b is not seeing the permanent enrichment status being applied to this tank.

 

The data shows that compared to every other T10 or T9 Enriched tank, the 121b is an anomaly earning 35%-50% less credits than its eers , except the 'M60' which WG footnoted as not having enhanced credit earnings. 

 

You can go to blitzstars and do a vehicle compare between the 121b and every other T9 or T10 Enriched tank and see the data for yourselves.


Edited by ballist1x, 13 February 2019 - 07:58 AM.


Mjr_Eazy #13 Posted 13 February 2019 - 07:59 AM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 23311 battles
  • 4,565
  • [BT_SV]
  • Member since:
    04-26-2017

View Postballist1x, on 13 February 2019 - 07:55 AM, said:

 

 

Good lad, whatever anyone's opinions on T10 premium/enriched tanks is whoever bought the 121b is not seeing the permanent enrichment status being applied to this tank.

 

The data shows that compared to every other T10 or T9 Enriched tank, the 121b is an anomaly earning 35%-50% less credits than its eers , except the 'M60' which WG footnoted as not having enhanced credit earnings. 

 

You can go to blitzstars and do a vehicle compare between the 121b and every other T9 or T10 Enriched tank and see the data for yourselves.

 

No worries, I did look at Blitzstars and have raised a ticket...

I asked them to either a. Refund me and correct the marketing or b. Improve the enrichment :)

I’m expecting option c is what I’ll get - prevarication and BS about earnings being battle dependent and it’s all fine...


He who stops being better stops being good.  Oliver Cromwell I was soundly beaten, and i am the better for it.  Monty

I keep getting beaten but getting better so its all good man :harp:. Major Eazy


ballist1x #14 Posted 13 February 2019 - 08:02 AM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Player
  • 14172 battles
  • 542
  • [WILD]
  • Member since:
    12-04-2016

Well played!!

Vs other Enriched t10 and t9 tanks;

 

Posted Image

 

Vs other tech tree tanks and their enrichment factors;

 

Posted Image

 

I have PM'd ribblestripe and reached out to Meadsy69, Sk8xtrm, and bushka to see if they can put in a question to WG also.

 

 



Banquo__ #15 Posted 14 February 2019 - 04:28 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 23235 battles
  • 8
  • [RIGCZ]
  • Member since:
    09-12-2016
Good job, @ballist1x ! Ticket on its way :)

ballist1x #16 Posted 14 February 2019 - 08:03 AM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Player
  • 14172 battles
  • 542
  • [WILD]
  • Member since:
    12-04-2016

View PostBanquo__, on 14 February 2019 - 04:28 AM, said:

Good job, @ballist1x ! Ticket on its way :)

 

 

Good work!

Justice for the Commando 121B!!

 

I just ask one thing, would you let me know the outcome if any tickets raised so we can see how WG respond and whether we get any different responses?



ballist1x #17 Posted 14 February 2019 - 09:50 AM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Player
  • 14172 battles
  • 542
  • [WILD]
  • Member since:
    12-04-2016

Well I got an answer from WG, basically the tank is not enriched and won't be by the sounds of it for balance reasons.

 

Therefore we can conclude that the tank is being incorrectly / falsely advertised as earning similar credits to A tech tree tank with enrichment;

 

Posted Image



Mjr_Eazy #18 Posted 14 February 2019 - 01:12 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Player
  • 23311 battles
  • 4,565
  • [BT_SV]
  • Member since:
    04-26-2017

As suspected, option c, gits, typical thieving WG.

Yeah, that is false/misleading marketing then, I'll be asking for a refund on mine (assuming I get the same answer)...

Updated: I got exactly the same answer! I’ve responded saying my issue is not resolved and that they either made a mistake with it’s co-effiecient or they lied and I want my money back. I expect more weasel words but will keep trying...


Edited by Mjr_Eazy, 14 February 2019 - 02:59 PM.

He who stops being better stops being good.  Oliver Cromwell I was soundly beaten, and i am the better for it.  Monty

I keep getting beaten but getting better so its all good man :harp:. Major Eazy


ballist1x #19 Posted 14 February 2019 - 08:21 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Player
  • 14172 battles
  • 542
  • [WILD]
  • Member since:
    12-04-2016

View PostMjr_Eazy, on 14 February 2019 - 01:12 PM, said:

As suspected, option c, gits, typical thieving WG.

Yeah, that is false/misleading marketing then, I'll be asking for a refund on mine (assuming I get the same answer)...

Updated: I got exactly the same answer! I’ve responded saying my issue is not resolved and that they either made a mistake with it’s co-effiecient or they lied and I want my money back. I expect more weasel words but will keep trying...

 

 

Absolute barstewArds. 

 

How do you balance a tank, on it's credit earning when all the other similarly enriched tanks earn loads more ?

 

WG are certainly never going to get any more money from me.



ballist1x #20 Posted 15 February 2019 - 07:10 AM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Player
  • 14172 battles
  • 542
  • [WILD]
  • Member since:
    12-04-2016

WG doubling doubling down 

 

Posted Image






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users